Gennetian, L. and you may V. Knox. 2004. Taking and you will Staying Hitched: The consequences regarding a great Minnesota Appeal Change System for the Relationship Stability. Ny: MDRC .

Furstenberg, F. and you may A good Cherlin. 1994. Divided Household: What happens so you can Children whenever Moms and dads Region. Cambridge, MA : Harvard School Press.

My cardio went so you can a sweet son exactly who emailed me personally to ask having my personal advice for matchmaking a separated woman that have kids

Halford, W. K., Yards. R. Sanders, and you will B. C. Behrens. 2001. “Is also Enjoy Studies Avoid Matchmaking Troubles from inside the At-Exposure People? ” Record of Family relations Mindset 15, 4: 750-768.

Hetherington, Elizabeth. M., Yards. Cox, and Roentgen. Cox. 1982. “Ramifications of Separation towards Mothers and kids.” In the Meters. Lamb (ed.), Nontraditional Group. Hillsdale, Nj : Erlbaum.

Heyman, Roentgen. Age. 2001. “Observance out of Few Problems: Logical Comparison Applications, Persistent Facts, and you can Unstable Foundations.” Mental Research 13: 5-35.

Karney, B. R., L. Tale, and T. Bradbury. 2003. “Marriage ceremonies into the Framework: Connections Anywhere between Persistent and you can Acute Be concerned Certainly one of Newlyweds.” Speech from the Around the globe Meeting towards Developmental Course of People Managing Be concerned, , Boston College or university, Chestnut Slope, MA .

McLanahan, S., I. Garfinkel., and you can Roentgen. B. Mincy. 2001. “Delicate Household, Appeal Reform, and you may Relationship.” Plan Brief Zero. 10. Washington DC : Brookings Organization.

McLanahan, S., and you will G. Continue reading →